Comments on: KS-03: Moore Will Not Seek Re-Election http://forwardkansas.com/2009/11/1565/ Kansas Politics, Without the Crazy Tue, 09 Mar 2010 00:28:53 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: levihenryhttp://forwardkansas.com/2009/11/1565/comment-page-1/#comment-136 levihenry Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:43:36 +0000 http://forwardkansas.com/2009/11/bench-for-democrats-takes-another-hit-moore-will-not-run-in-ks-03/#comment-136 Tom--<br><br>Forgive me if I don't make many posts about you or, for that matter, include in any subsequent posts. We're in the business of posting about credible candidates in a way that readers can cut through the BS (you) to the real meat and potatoes. Selling your house and putting $80k of your own cash in your Congressional run does not make you credible. And, if you don't like it, you can call our editors at 1-800-NO-WHINE. They'll be very receptive. Tom–

Forgive me if I don't make many posts about you or, for that matter, include in any subsequent posts. We're in the business of posting about credible candidates in a way that readers can cut through the BS (you) to the real meat and potatoes. Selling your house and putting $80k of your own cash in your Congressional run does not make you credible. And, if you don't like it, you can call our editors at 1-800-NO-WHINE. They'll be very receptive.

]]> By: levihenryhttp://forwardkansas.com/2009/11/1565/comment-page-1/#comment-137 levihenry Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:41:08 +0000 http://forwardkansas.com/2009/11/bench-for-democrats-takes-another-hit-moore-will-not-run-in-ks-03/#comment-137 TMV--I stand by what was posted. First, the story isn't about the Stupak-Pitts Amendment, so, forgive me, but I practiced brevity so as not to lose the readers from the primary purpose of the story--that D Mo was dropping out. Second, the statement is factually correct. The Stupak Amendment changed the Hyde Amendment, and D Mo voted against Stupak to sustain Hyde. That's how it reads to several others who I have given the opportunity to review it. TMV–I stand by what was posted. First, the story isn't about the Stupak-Pitts Amendment, so, forgive me, but I practiced brevity so as not to lose the readers from the primary purpose of the story–that D Mo was dropping out. Second, the statement is factually correct. The Stupak Amendment changed the Hyde Amendment, and D Mo voted against Stupak to sustain Hyde. That's how it reads to several others who I have given the opportunity to review it.

]]> By: thomasescherercandidate3rdhttp://forwardkansas.com/2009/11/1565/comment-page-1/#comment-131 thomasescherercandidate3rd Tue, 24 Nov 2009 04:33:23 +0000 http://forwardkansas.com/2009/11/bench-for-democrats-takes-another-hit-moore-will-not-run-in-ks-03/#comment-131 The KC Star writer, Steve Kraske was ordered to do a correction for again refusing to acknowledge factuallly, I am one of the top GOP candidates. You can verify it at <a href="http://www.fec.gov" rel="nofollow">www.fec.gov</a>. I had to call the CEO of McClatchy Group today on why Kraske keeps refusing to acknowledge a) that I have been filed for months, b) that I have more in the congressional campaign than all the other GOP candidates combined and c) that all the GOP web sites list me as a congressional candidate. <br><br>I guess Kraske is afraid I have the best shot at winning the congressional race. So, him and Steve Rose continue to inform the residents of this state I am filed as a candidate, as many of my many dem blog friends have known for a long time. Remember, I am running for all residents of this state and the 3rd District. I am assuming Larry Gates is regretting not being more supportive and friendly to me when I was running for US Congress as a democrat. Larry, you need to be replaced.<br><br>Tomorrow, the 3rd Congressional forum will be at the KU campus at 6:30. Before that, I have an interview with the Lawrence Journal World. They seem to know I am running for United States Congress. And if you did not know, now you do. be unlike the KC Star and the Wichita Eagle and check the facts yourself at <a href="http://www.fec.gov" rel="nofollow">www.fec.gov</a>. <br><br>The local media can no longer be trusted because apparently, facts are not important to them anymore. The KC Star writer, Steve Kraske was ordered to do a correction for again refusing to acknowledge factuallly, I am one of the top GOP candidates. You can verify it at http://www.fec.gov. I had to call the CEO of McClatchy Group today on why Kraske keeps refusing to acknowledge a) that I have been filed for months, b) that I have more in the congressional campaign than all the other GOP candidates combined and c) that all the GOP web sites list me as a congressional candidate.

I guess Kraske is afraid I have the best shot at winning the congressional race. So, him and Steve Rose continue to inform the residents of this state I am filed as a candidate, as many of my many dem blog friends have known for a long time. Remember, I am running for all residents of this state and the 3rd District. I am assuming Larry Gates is regretting not being more supportive and friendly to me when I was running for US Congress as a democrat. Larry, you need to be replaced.

Tomorrow, the 3rd Congressional forum will be at the KU campus at 6:30. Before that, I have an interview with the Lawrence Journal World. They seem to know I am running for United States Congress. And if you did not know, now you do. be unlike the KC Star and the Wichita Eagle and check the facts yourself at http://www.fec.gov.

The local media can no longer be trusted because apparently, facts are not important to them anymore.

]]> By: jococitizenhttp://forwardkansas.com/2009/11/1565/comment-page-1/#comment-130 jococitizen Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:09:21 +0000 http://forwardkansas.com/2009/11/bench-for-democrats-takes-another-hit-moore-will-not-run-in-ks-03/#comment-130 Reardon would be a good choice. Lots of potential without tainting of the DC crowd. Reardon would be a good choice. Lots of potential without tainting of the DC crowd.

]]> By: themadvoterhttp://forwardkansas.com/2009/11/1565/comment-page-1/#comment-129 themadvoter Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:33:36 +0000 http://forwardkansas.com/2009/11/bench-for-democrats-takes-another-hit-moore-will-not-run-in-ks-03/#comment-129 Er, no, voting against the Stupak-Pitts Amendment wasn't a change from the Hyde Amendment. Stupak-Pitts, by its design, would end up forcing all private insurers involved in the exchange from providing abortion services, even if they already do, according to insurance industry execs. Even without Stupak-Pitts, Hyde would be upheld. Women on Medicaid, in the public option exchange, or the half dozen other medical coverage programs affected by Hyde, would still have to find the funds themselves for their abortions, even medically necessary ones. <br><br>Moore's vote against Stupak-Pitts *upheld* Hyde, making no change to the 32 year old policy, while everyone else's went above and beyond it. Er, no, voting against the Stupak-Pitts Amendment wasn't a change from the Hyde Amendment. Stupak-Pitts, by its design, would end up forcing all private insurers involved in the exchange from providing abortion services, even if they already do, according to insurance industry execs. Even without Stupak-Pitts, Hyde would be upheld. Women on Medicaid, in the public option exchange, or the half dozen other medical coverage programs affected by Hyde, would still have to find the funds themselves for their abortions, even medically necessary ones.

Moore's vote against Stupak-Pitts *upheld* Hyde, making no change to the 32 year old policy, while everyone else's went above and beyond it.

]]>